New York City’s Organ Vehicle

By Max Leiserson


It is no secret that organ donations in the U.S. do not meet the needs of the public; there are generally 100,000 people waiting for donor organs at any given time. 1 This remains true despite both the efforts to make registering as an organ donor easier and the widespread publicity of the multiple lives a single organ donor can save. By all accounts, the main way this shortage can be alleviated, and the thousands of people in the U.S. who are waiting for life-saving transplants can be provided for, is through a dramatic increase in organ donors. For example, Spain and Norway, international leaders in the proportion of organ donors in the population, have seen their waiting lists remain consistent or even shrink. 2 Spain’s high rate of organ donors is in large part due to their “opt out” program, where individuals are organ donors unless they specifically request not to be, and there are bills to adopt just such a policy in states in the U.S. (note that the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984 gives states the prerogative to determine their own organ donor policies). 3

However, even with a dramatic increase in organ donors, there would remain another key challenge: 95 percent of deaths happen outside of a hospital,4 and there is only a 20-30 minute window after death in which organs can be saved. 5 Consequently, current policy is that only those who die in hospitals are eligible to be organ donors. Thus even if organ donor rates rose prodigiously, a large share of life-saving organs would not be preserved in time.

But New York City has proposed a unique plan to address this challenge: an “organ preservation vehicle.” The sole responsibility of the vehicle would be to monitor police and ambulance radio frequencies to identify individuals who are declared dead but have no chance of reaching a hospital in time for their organs to be preserved. Then, when such an individual is found, the vehicle would rush him or her to the hospital. In this manner, a greater proportion of donor organs could be saved, at least in situations where an ambulance or police officer arrived shortly after an individual died. This would provide a much-needed increase in efficiency for life-saving transplants.

Just as it seems every organ donation policy has, the organ preservation vehicle has created controversy. First and perhaps most alarming is the myth that individuals will be prematurely declared dead on scene in order for the organ preservation team to take that person’s organs. This is just a variation of the myth6 that permeates all organ donation: that doctors do not work as hard to save the lives of organ donors. Nevertheless the organizers of the organ preservation vehicle project have addressed the issue by requiring the preservation team to remain out of sight of the paramedics and police until an individual has been declared dead. Consequently, those on the scene would not be certain that the organ preservation vehicle would arrive even if they were to declare an individual dead. The second major challenge to the organ preservation vehicle is that it could impede effective investigations by the police. When the cause of death is unclear and unusual, the police are required to turn the body over to a medical examiner to investigate the cause of death. At that point, only the medical examiner can release the body and allow its organs to be preserved. However, with such a short window of time, critics of the organ preservation vehicle are concerned that police officers will have to make the decisions usually under the jurisdiction of the medical examiner.

Despite these concerns, the police and medical examiner’s offices in New York City have agreed to a pilot program of 4-6 months to evaluate and tweak the organ preservation vehicle program if necessary. Given that no new issues arise, the program is expected to expand and perhaps be adopted by other regions. While progress on an opt-out organ donor policy remains piecemeal and roughshod, progress is being made on the second major challenge of organ donation, which is to conserve the organs of the 95 percent of donors who die outside hospitals.


Brody, Jane E. “Out of Grief Sprouts a Life-Saving Legacy.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 17 Aug. 2010. Web. 17 Aug. 2010.
Camero, S., and J. Forsythe. “How Can We Improve Organ Donation Rates? Research into the Identification of Factors Which May Influence the Variation.” Nefrología 21.5 (2001): 68-77. Web.
Drexel, Kafi. “NYPD Signs Off On Organ Transport Pilot Program.” NY1. NY1 News, 13 Aug. 2010. Web. 9 Oct. 2010.
Hartocollis, Anemona. “A Plan to Recover More Organs for Transplant Runs Into Difficulty.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 02 Aug. 2010. Web. 02 Aug. 2010.
H.R. 4080, 98th Cong., U.S. G.P.O. (1984) (enacted). Print.
Mayo Clinic.“Organ Donation: Don’t Let These Myths Confuse You.” Cleveland: Mayo Clinic, 2010. 03 Apr. 2010.

Subject: Bioethics, Healthcare Policy
blog comments powered by Disqus
Copyright © 2022, TuftScope | About | Contact |
Site designed by .
Site maintained by .